java archive
date index for January, 2002

This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2002
21:40 Re: propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Tom Tromey
20:54 relocate bits of posix.cc into natPosix*.cc? Adam Megacz
20:44 propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl Adam Megacz
19:55 Re: frontend bug -- inner classes Adam Megacz
19:37 jc1 segfaults? Adam Megacz
16:29 Re: frontend bug -- inner classes Bryce McKinlay
16:18 Re: frontend bug -- inner classes Alexandre Petit-Bianco
16:07 frontend bug -- inner classes Adam Megacz
15:54 Re: Native compilation article Bryce McKinlay
14:20 RE: Native compilation article Boehm, Hans
13:46 Re: Native compilation article Jeff Sturm
10:00 Re: Native compilation article Tom Tromey
09:15 Re: Native compilation article Martyn Honeyford
08:58 Re: Patch: FYI: verifier -vs- merged subroutines Tom Tromey
05:22 Re: Patch: FYI: verifier -vs- merged subroutines Nic Ferrier
04:47 Re: "division: function singularity" in libjava/java/lang/e_log.c:107 Andrew Haley

January 30, 2002
23:08 the prodigal patches... Adam Megacz
22:48 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
22:46 Re: Native compilation article Adam Megacz
22:45 Re: Native compilation article Alexandre Petit-Bianco
22:35 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Bryce McKinlay
22:31 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Bryce McKinlay
22:30 Re: Native compilation article Bryce McKinlay
22:16 Re: Native compilation article Alexandre Petit-Bianco
22:06 Re: name of libgcj.jar Tom Tromey
22:06 Re: "division: function singularity" in libjava/java/lang/e_log.c:107 Tom Tromey
22:05 Re: Problems in GCJ Jeff Sturm
22:04 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tom Tromey
22:04 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Adam Megacz
22:01 Re: Native compilation article Adam Megacz
22:00 Re: java bootstrap error on m68k-linux Tom Tromey
21:58 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Tom Tromey
21:57 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Tom Tromey
21:55 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Tom Tromey
21:51 RE: [RFA] boehm-gc for AIX Jeff Sturm
21:43 Re: Problems in GCJ Tom Tromey
21:34 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? shudo
21:19 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bringjava vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) shudo
20:10 Problems in GCJ Deepak
18:30 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL [[ how I finally solved it ]] Adam Megacz
18:15 xwt-announce mailing list created so I can stop spamming java@gcc.gnu.org Adam Megacz
17:32 Re: Native compilation article Bryce McKinlay
17:21 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL [[ how I finally solved it ]] Bryce McKinlay
17:18 Re: __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Bryce McKinlay
16:51 __CD / __CT / __FL naming collision? Adam Megacz
16:08 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL [[ how I finally solved it ]] Adam Megacz
16:04 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
16:00 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
15:58 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
14:56 Re: libjava won't build on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu (Red Hat Linux 7.0) Tom Tromey
13:52 Re: libjava won't build on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu (Red Hat Linux 7.0) Alexandre Oliva
13:16 Re: libjava won't build on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu (Red Hat Linux 7.0) Tom Tromey

January 29, 2002
23:12 libjava won't build on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu (Red Hat Linux 7.0) Alexandre Oliva
16:13 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Andrew Haley
16:08 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Andrew Haley
15:52 java bootstrap error on m68k-linux Matthias Klose
15:28 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
14:47 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Bryce McKinlay
14:44 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Anthony Green
14:28 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
14:24 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
14:17 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
13:59 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Per Bothner
13:58 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Anthony Green
13:55 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Anthony Green
13:55 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Bryce McKinlay
13:34 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
13:13 RE: [RFA] boehm-gc for AIX Boehm, Hans
13:02 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Bryce McKinlay
12:36 Re: banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*? Anthony Green
12:34 Re: More questions about _GLOBAL Anthony Green
12:06 Re: CNI doc question Bryce McKinlay
11:48 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Etienne M. Gagnon
11:37 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tom Tromey
11:37 Re: Native compilation article Tom Tromey
11:10 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Brian Jones
11:07 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Brian Jones
10:10 Re: [RFA] boehm-gc for AIX Adam Megacz
09:59 More questions about _GLOBAL Adam Megacz
09:50 Re: banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*? Adam Megacz
08:59 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Andrew Haley
08:48 Re: Native compilation article Martyn Honeyford
08:42 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Per Bothner
08:20 Re: CNI doc question Tony Knaus
07:55 Re: [RFA] boehm-gc for AIX David Edelsohn
06:44 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Nic Ferrier
06:34 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Andrew Haley
06:30 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Nic Ferrier
05:39 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Aaron M. Renn
04:37 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Bryce McKinlay
04:19 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola
04:18 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola
04:16 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola
03:56 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Andrew Haley
03:28 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola
02:26 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Nic Ferrier

January 28, 2002
22:35 Re: GCJ dumping Core Bryce McKinlay
21:38 Re: GCJ dumping Core deepak22j
21:25 Re: [RFA] boehm-gc for AIX Tom Tromey
21:19 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tom Tromey
21:16 Re: Problem with the online CNI manual Tom Tromey
21:15 Re: Native compilation article Tom Tromey
20:27 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Bryce McKinlay
19:07 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Tom Tromey
18:40 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Fernando Lozano
18:13 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Per Bothner
18:06 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Fernando Lozano
17:05 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Bryce McKinlay
17:04 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Fernando Lozano
16:53 Re: banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*? Bryce McKinlay
16:41 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Bryce McKinlay
16:25 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Bryce McKinlay
16:18 Re: verification problems Tom Tromey
16:11 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Bryce McKinlay
16:08 Re: CNI doc question Bryce McKinlay
16:07 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Bryce McKinlay
16:06 Re: gcj vs classpath merge status Tom Tromey
16:01 Re: Speaking of runtime options Tom Tromey
15:58 Re: Speaking of runtime options Tom Tromey
15:58 Re: GCJ slower than JDK? Per Bothner
15:57 Re: Speaking of runtime options Tom Tromey
15:46 Re: Speaking of runtime options Bryce McKinlay
15:37 Re: Speaking of runtime options Nic Ferrier
15:36 Re: way to add a compiler flag via configure? Bryce McKinlay
15:32 Re: Speaking of runtime options Bryce McKinlay
15:23 verification problems Nic Ferrier
15:22 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Bryce McKinlay
15:18 GCJ slower than JDK? Fernando Lozano
15:13 gcj vs classpath merge status Nic Ferrier
15:12 Re: [RFA] boehm-gc for AIX Bryce McKinlay
14:02 Re: Curious verifier error Alexandre Petit-Bianco
14:01 Re: Curious verifier error Tom Tromey
13:58 Re: Curious verifier error Nic Ferrier
13:17 Re: Curious verifier error Tom Tromey
12:04 RE: Speaking of runtime options Boehm, Hans
11:38 Re: banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*? Per Bothner
11:14 Re: banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*? Adam Megacz
11:08 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Adam Megacz
11:05 Re: Curious verifier error Nic Ferrier
10:58 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Adam Megacz
10:55 Re: Curious verifier error Tom Tromey
10:45 Re: banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*? Per Bothner
10:32 banging my head against the wall.... _GLOBAL__I__*? Adam Megacz
09:57 Re: Curious verifier error Tom Tromey
09:54 Re: Curious verifier error Jeff Sturm
09:29 Curious verifier error Nic Ferrier
09:01 Re: verifier error Nic Ferrier
08:32 Re: verifier error Per Bothner
08:29 Re: way to add a compiler flag via configure? Anthony Green
08:14 Re: verifier error Tom Tromey
08:12 Re: verifier error Tom Tromey
03:13 Re: verifier error Nic Ferrier
02:15 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola
02:13 signal handling Andrew Haley
02:03 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola

January 27, 2002
22:34 Re: way to add a compiler flag via configure? Tom Tromey
22:09 Re: verifier error Per Bothner
22:04 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Per Bothner
21:58 Re: verifier error Tom Tromey
21:48 Re: Another CNI q Tom Tromey
20:44 verifier error Nic Ferrier
20:40 Another CNI q Nic Ferrier
20:15 Re: CNI doc question Jeff Sturm
19:53 CNI doc question Nic Ferrier
18:11 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Adam Megacz
17:17 Re: Speaking of runtime options Nic Ferrier
17:15 way to add a compiler flag via configure? Adam Megacz
17:06 Re: Speaking of runtime options Tom Tromey
16:52 Re: verification error whilst running Paperclips Nic Ferrier
16:49 Re: verification error whilst running Paperclips Tom Tromey
16:48 Re: verification error whilst running Paperclips Per Bothner
16:43 signal handling Nic Ferrier
16:37 Speaking of runtime options Nic Ferrier
16:34 verification error whilst running Paperclips Nic Ferrier
16:03 Re: verifier problem Tom Tromey
13:33 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Adam Megacz
08:00 Re: [RFA] boehm-gc for AIX Jeff Sturm

January 26, 2002
23:15 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
19:13 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Daniel Jacobowitz
18:31 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Bryce McKinlay
18:14 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Tom Tromey
11:27 verifier problem Per Bothner
04:11 libjava & darwin :-) Andreas Tobler

January 25, 2002
23:22 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Daniel Jacobowitz
22:30 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bringjava vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) shudo
14:55 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Bryce McKinlay
14:39 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Andreas Tobler
13:48 Re: Native compilation article Anthony Green
13:45 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Bryce McKinlay
13:45 Re: Native compilation article Andrew Haley
13:44 Re: Native compilation article Bryce McKinlay
13:40 Re: Native compilation article Anthony Green
13:27 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Andreas Tobler
13:11 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Andreas Tobler
13:11 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Andrew Haley
13:09 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Bryce McKinlay
13:06 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Bryce McKinlay
13:02 Re: Native compilation article Tom Tromey
13:01 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Tom Tromey
12:57 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Andrew Haley
12:44 Re: Problem with the online CNI manual Bryce McKinlay
12:40 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Bryce McKinlay
12:08 Re: Native compilation article Bryce McKinlay
10:09 Re: Native compilation article Anthony Green
10:02 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Andreas Tobler
06:26 Re: Native compilation article shudo
05:56 Problem with the online CNI manual Nic Ferrier
05:04 Re: Native compilation article Nic Ferrier
01:43 RE: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley
01:10 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola
00:13 Native compilation article Joerg Brunsmann

January 24, 2002
23:21 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
22:34 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Andreas Tobler
22:24 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Daniel Jacobowitz
21:01 First AWT Success! Tom Tromey
19:13 Re: Bug in ColorModel Tom Tromey
19:06 Bug in ColorModel BENOWITZ,EDWARD GEORGE
18:50 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Richard Henderson
18:43 Re: undefined symbol error message Myriam Abramson
18:35 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Bryce McKinlay
17:18 Re: build error Tom Tromey
17:01 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Richard Henderson
16:34 RE: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Boehm, Hans
15:11 Re: nogc.cc & darwin Bryce McKinlay
14:09 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Per Bothner
13:58 RE: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Boehm, Hans
13:05 nogc.cc & darwin Andreas Tobler
13:00 build error Dachuan Yu
09:03 Re: about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tom Tromey
08:57 Re: libjava does not build (fwd) Tom Tromey
08:35 libjava does not build (fwd) Jeff Sturm
05:42 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley
01:05 about non-compatible optimization (was: Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance) Tuomas Leikola

January 23, 2002
22:33 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
22:27 RE: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Boehm, Hans
20:51 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
20:31 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Bryce McKinlay
20:16 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Tom Tromey
20:11 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
19:39 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Bryce McKinlay
18:05 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Richard Henderson
17:56 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
17:34 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
16:33 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Adam Megacz
16:24 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Bryce McKinlay
16:03 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Richard Henderson
15:50 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Bryce McKinlay
15:27 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Bryce McKinlay
14:02 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Tom Tromey
13:10 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
13:06 Re: undefined symbol error message Jeff Sturm
12:56 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Jeff Sturm
12:48 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Bryce McKinlay
12:17 RE: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES f ornatSystem.cc Boehm, Hans
12:07 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES f ornatSystem.cc Andreas Tobler
12:02 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
11:38 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Tom Tromey
11:38 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Tom Tromey
11:38 Re: undefined symbol error message Tom Tromey
11:35 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Tom Tromey
11:32 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES f ornatSystem.cc Tom Tromey
11:20 Re: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Mark Mitchell
11:02 RE: patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Boehm, Hans
09:55 patch to bring java vtables closer to g++ abi conformance Per Bothner
07:58 Re: New license wording Etienne M. Gagnon
06:51 undefined symbol error message myriam
02:09 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley

January 22, 2002
20:54 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Bryce McKinlay
20:10 Re: quickie about visibility Bryce McKinlay
19:58 Re: quickie about visibility Jeff Sturm
19:36 Re: New license wording Bryce McKinlay
19:28 Re: quickie about visibility Bryce McKinlay
19:21 Re: quickie about visibility Nic Ferrier
19:15 Re: quickie about visibility Bryce McKinlay
19:14 Re: a quicky about gcj command line Per Bothner
19:07 [PATCH] PR 5080 Craig Rodrigues
19:02 Re: a quicky about gcj command line Bryce McKinlay
18:35 quickie about visibility Nic Ferrier
18:26 Re: a quick about namespaces Alexandre Oliva
17:56 a quick about namespaces Nic Ferrier
17:49 Re: New license wording Etienne M. Gagnon
17:25 a quicky about gcj command line Nic Ferrier
16:38 Re: New license wording Bryce McKinlay
15:19 RE: [Fwd: Re: patch to ignore SIGPWR and SIGXCPU (used by pthread s)] Boehm, Hans
15:16 Re: New license wording Mark Wielaard
14:49 Final Call for Papers - USENIX Java Virtual Machine '02 Ann Tsai
11:22 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Tom Tromey
08:46 Re: no matching function Tom Tromey
06:36 no matching function Matthew Bemis
06:04 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley
02:04 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley
02:02 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley
00:00 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES fornatSystem.cc Andreas Tobler

January 21, 2002
20:58 Re: name of libgcj.jar Anthony Green
17:44 Re: Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Bryce McKinlay
17:10 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Bryce McKinlay
16:29 Re: why I was seeing exceptions thrown across threads -- a detailedexplanation Anthony Green
15:13 Re: [Fwd: Re: patch to ignore SIGPWR and SIGXCPU (used by pthread s)] Bryce McKinlay
15:02 Re: progress on method-gc / mangling questions Alexandre Petit-Bianco
14:38 progress on method-gc / mangling questions Adam Megacz
12:01 Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley
11:03 Signal handling rewrite for Linux / i386 Andrew Haley
10:23 RE: [Fwd: Re: patch to ignore SIGPWR and SIGXCPU (used by pthreads)] Boehm, Hans
10:12 RE: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES fornatSystem.cc Boehm, Hans
09:52 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES fornatSystem.cc Jeff Sturm
09:40 Re: name of libgcj.jar Jeff Sturm
09:28 Re: [Fwd: Re: patch to ignore SIGPWR and SIGXCPU (used by pthreads)] Jeff Sturm
08:51 Re: name of libgcj.jar Tom Tromey
08:50 Re: [Fwd: Re: patch to ignore SIGPWR and SIGXCPU (used by pthreads)] Per Bothner

January 20, 2002
23:41 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES fornatSystem.cc Andreas Tobler
22:51 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES fornatSystem.cc Stan Shebs
22:07 Re: [Fwd: Re: patch to ignore SIGPWR and SIGXCPU (used by pthreads)] Bryce McKinlay
21:42 [Fwd: Re: patch to ignore SIGPWR and SIGXCPU (used by pthreads)] Per Bothner
20:00 Re: why I was seeing exceptions thrown across threads -- a detailed explanation Cedric Berger
19:20 Re: why I was seeing exceptions thrown across threads -- a detailed explanation Adam Megacz
15:12 Re: name of libgcj.jar Bryce McKinlay
14:07 Re: name of libgcj.jar Tom Tromey
14:03 Re: name of libgcj.jar Matthias Klose
11:23 Re: name of libgcj.jar Tom Tromey
08:18 name of libgcj.jar Matthias Klose

January 19, 2002
15:31 "division: function singularity" in libjava/java/lang/e_log.c:107 Christian Joensson
08:44 Re: New license wording Mark Wielaard

January 17, 2002
14:38 Re: why I was seeing exceptions thrown across threads -- a detailed explanation Tom Tromey
13:52 Re: why I was seeing exceptions thrown across threads -- a detailed explanation Adam Megacz
10:14 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES for natSystem.cc Andreas Tobler
08:38 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES for natSystem.cc Tom Tromey
08:35 Re: why I was seeing exceptions thrown across threads -- a detailed explanation Tom Tromey

January 16, 2002
18:02 why I was seeing exceptions thrown across threads -- a detailed explanation Adam Megacz
12:55 Re: Why is jni.j installed in ${prefix}/include? Tom Tromey
12:55 Re: Why is jni.j installed in ${prefix}/include? Tom Tromey
12:39 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES for natSystem.cc Andreas Tobler
11:29 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES for natSystem.cc Tom Tromey
11:15 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES for natSystem.cc Andreas Tobler

January 15, 2002
19:49 Re: testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES for natSystem.cc Tom Tromey
16:26 Re: libgcj verifier handling of uninitialized types Tom Tromey
14:01 libgcj verifier handling of uninitialized types Per Bothner
13:56 Re: better error on VerifyError Tom Tromey
13:18 better error on VerifyError Per Bothner
12:19 RE: gcj users information Ghanta, Bose
10:15 Re: gcj users information Tom Tromey
10:13 Re: libjava and gthreads Tom Tromey
08:18 gcj users information Ghanta, Bose
02:37 Re: setjmp() shares a single jmp_buf across all threads [fixed] Andrew Haley

January 14, 2002
19:45 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Tom Tromey
17:04 Re: setjmp() shares a single jmp_buf across all threads [fixed] Adam Megacz
15:06 Re: setjmp() shares a single jmp_buf across all threads Andrew Haley
14:36 Re: setjmp() shares a single jmp_buf across all threads Andrew Haley
14:22 Re: New license wording Etienne M. Gagnon
13:39 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Adam Megacz
13:14 Re: setjmp() shares a single jmp_buf across all threads Adam Megacz
12:46 libjava and gthreads Adam Megacz
11:15 testsuite problems on darwin was: [patch] HAVE_LC_MESSAGES for natSystem.cc Andreas Tobler
10:31 Re: JVM -b backend Per Bothner
10:30 setjmp() shares a single jmp_buf across all threads Andrew Haley
10:21 Re: JVM -b backend Adam Megacz
09:46 Re: naming conflicts in libgcj.a Tom Tromey
09:45 Re: JVM -b backend Tom Tromey
09:37 Re: JVM -b backend Adam Megacz
09:33 naming conflicts in libgcj.a Adam Megacz
09:24 setjmp() shares a single jmp_buf across all threads Adam Megacz

January 13, 2002
18:50 Re: AWT licensing Brian Jones
18:31 Re: AWT licensing Bryce McKinlay
13:03 Re: undefined references Tom Tromey
13:03 Re: undefined references Tom Tromey
10:03 Re: Bug on Solaris Tom Tromey
09:44 Re: AWT licensing Etienne M. Gagnon
02:06 Re: undefined references Santosh Cheler
01:01 undefined references Santosh Cheler

January 12, 2002
22:13 Re: "made with GCJ" Anthony Green
17:55 "made with GCJ" Adam Megacz
16:45 Re: Why is jni.j installed in ${prefix}/include? Per Bothner

January 11, 2002
17:37 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Bryce McKinlay
17:25 Re: There is room for improvement Bryce McKinlay
17:12 Re: Bug on Solaris Bryce McKinlay
12:28 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
11:29 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler

January 10, 2002
20:41 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Tom Tromey
16:58 Re: CNI Per Bothner
13:33 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
12:22 Re: There is room for improvement Jeff Sturm
11:46 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Tom Tromey
11:07 Re: Bug on Solaris Jeff Sturm
10:44 Re: LC_MESSAGES on darwin Tom Tromey
08:51 an existing gpl awt-lib magnus persson
06:48 Why is jni.j installed in ${prefix}/include? Martin Kahlert
06:29 Re: configure problem Mark Wielaard
06:01 configure problem Matthew H Bemis
03:11 Re: There is room for improvement Andrew Haley
01:07 Re: There is room for improvement Martin Kahlert
01:00 There is room for improvement Martin Kahlert

January 09, 2002
23:23 CNI dipen nipun shah
22:45 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
20:57 wierd exception / thread interaction on win32 Adam Megacz
16:09 Re: Bug on Solaris Jeff Sturm
14:07 LC_MESSAGES on darwin Andreas Tobler
12:57 Re: Bug on Solaris Tom Tromey
12:55 Re: Bug on Solaris Tom Tromey
09:43 Re: Bug on Solaris Jeff Sturm
08:14 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
08:11 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
07:59 Re: libgcj.jar Jeff Sturm
07:44 Re: Bug on Solaris Jeff Sturm
07:04 libgcj.jar Matthew H Bemis

January 08, 2002
23:16 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
20:10 Re: JVM -b backend Tom Tromey
20:03 JVM -b backend Mike Brown
17:10 Re: Bug on Solaris Bryce McKinlay
13:43 Re: Bug on Solaris Jeff Sturm
10:20 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
10:14 Re: Bug on Solaris Jeff Sturm
07:14 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
07:08 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
06:54 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
06:53 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
06:49 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
06:46 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
06:26 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
05:59 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
03:46 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
03:39 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
03:24 Re: Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
02:41 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
01:50 Re: Bug on Solaris Alexandre Petit-Bianco
01:35 Re: Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert
01:17 Bug on Solaris Andrew Haley
00:46 Bug on Solaris Martin Kahlert

January 07, 2002
11:28 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Jeff Sturm
11:06 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
10:53 Call for Papers - USENIX Java Virtual Machine '02 Ann Tsai
10:47 sub system delivery error error
10:26 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Jeff Sturm
09:04 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
07:57 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
07:30 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Jeff Sturm
06:33 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
04:09 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
01:07 Re: section-gc and gcj Adam Megacz

January 06, 2002
13:51 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Tom Tromey
13:41 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
11:23 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Tom Tromey
11:14 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Tom Tromey

January 05, 2002
12:54 Re: libgcj/4616: Floating Point Math class problem on Tru64 Alpha v 5.1 Craig Rodrigues
05:31 Re: Revised clarifications for patch-testing instructions Gerald Pfeifer
01:49 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler

January 04, 2002
22:06 Re: java/1413: Internal compiler error in expand_end_case Alexandre Petit-Bianco
21:03 Re: section-gc and gcj Bryce McKinlay
20:11 Re: section-gc and gcj Adam Megacz
20:00 Re: patch#3 disable the libgcj interpreter under darwin Tom Tromey
19:57 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Tom Tromey
03:54 Re: Why wont my program run? Maybe an issue with gcj? Martin Willemoes Hansen
03:48 Re: Why wont my program run? Maybe an issue with gcj? Nic Ferrier
03:32 Why wont my program run? Maybe an issue with gcj? Martin Willemoes Hansen
01:46 Re: section-gc and gcj Anthony Green

January 03, 2002
22:13 section-gc and gcj Adam Megacz

January 02, 2002
15:07 Re: patch#3 disable the libgcj interpreter under darwin Bryce McKinlay
14:33 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Andreas Tobler
14:04 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Richard Henderson
14:02 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Andreas Tobler
13:41 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Richard Henderson
13:22 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Andreas Tobler
11:22 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Richard Henderson
10:27 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
09:54 Re: link problems under darwin5.2 Tom Tromey
07:27 Re: patch#3 disable the libgcj interpreter under darwin Andreas Tobler
07:22 Re: patch#3 disable the libgcj interpreter under darwin Tom Tromey
07:18 link problems under darwin5.2 Andreas Tobler
07:18 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Andreas Tobler
05:57 patch#3 disable the libgcj interpreter under darwin Andreas Tobler
03:25 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Andreas Tobler

January 01, 2002
15:47 Re: patch2 darwin & libgcj Tom Tromey
15:36 Re: Patch1 darwin & libgcj Tom Tromey


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.1