This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vs critical sections
- From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
- To: "''java at gcc dot gnu dot org ' '" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 23 Dec 2001 19:48:54 -0800
- Subject: Re: IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vs critical sections
- Organization: Myself
- References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BEE65@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
"Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:
> The only obvious anomaly is that you are building the GC with HBLKSIZE=1024,
> probably because you are cross-compiling, and hence SMALL_CONFIG is getting
> defined.
Why does boehm-gc automatically use SMALL_CONFIG when crosscompiling?
Is there any disadvantage to simply removing that line from
configure.in?
- a