This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [help interpreting statistics?]

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
Cc: "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 23 Dec 2001 00:09:42 -0700
Subject: Re: boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [help interpreting statistics?]
References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BEE62@hplex1.hpl.hp.com> <86bsgqv5xe.fsf@megacz.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Megacz <gcj@lists.megacz.com> writes:

>> What does "make check" in the boehm-gc directory do?  Does gctest
>> run at reasonable speed (a few seconds)?

Adam> Sadly, this doesn't work without a lot of effort since I'm
Adam> crosscompiling. If this problem turns out to be Really Really
Adam> hard to fix, I'll invest time in getting the test suite to work.

FYI, in the boehm-gc directory, `make check' just builds an executable
and then invokes it.  You can use `make gctest' (or in your case
probably gctest.exe) and then try running the result.  You don't have
to mess with dejagnu or anything like that.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vs critical sections
  - From: Adam Megacz

References:
- RE: documentation for boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [more info]
  - From: Boehm, Hans
- Re: boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [help interpreting statistics?]
  - From: Adam Megacz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]