This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Indirect dispatch without interpreter?
- From: Daniel Hartin Pasco <dlpasco at yahoo dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>, Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:24:18 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Indirect dispatch without interpreter?
- Reply-to: dan at brainmurmurs dot com
Excellent! I'm getting the same thing. My sgi mips
build is at least blocked where the rest of the world
is.
-Daniel
--- Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
> Jeff Sturm wrote:
>
> >This patch breaks my sparc-solaris build:
> >
> >2001-12-15 Bryce McKinlay
> <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
> > ...
> > (_Jv_MakeVTable): New function.
> >
> >_Jv_MakeVTable needs _Jv_BuildGCDescr, which is
> ifdef'ed out. Does
> >_Jv_BuildGCDescr need to be compiled
> unconditionally now, or will
> >_Jv_MakeVTable ever be called without an
> interpreter? (I'm guessing the
> >former, since as I understand it the point of
> flag_indirect_dispatch is
> >to construct all vtables at runtime.)
> >
>
> Yes, it should be built unconditionally.
> _Jv_BuildGCDescr is actually
> just a stub at the moment, but at some point we
> should get around to
> implementing it...
>
> regards
>
> Bryce.
>
>
>
>
=====
Daniel Hartin Pasco
B r a i n M u r m u r s
http://brainmurmurs.com
"Do not fear death so much but rather the inadequate life. "
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com