This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: where do stack traces get filled in?

From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 14 Dec 2001 07:33:11 -0500
Subject: Re: where do stack traces get filled in?
Organization: Myself
References: <867krrllxh.fsf@megacz.com> <87g06foehm.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <15384.58982.815824.776779@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com> writes:
> Yes.  The demangler code is GPLed.  If we linked with it, libgcj
> itself would need to be GPLed, and we can't do that.

Hey, I know this is way, way, way off-topic, but does anybody know how
Ximian can release a closed-source plugin for Evolution (which is
GPL)? Do they hold the copyright on all of Evolution, meaning that
nobody outside Ximian contributed anything?

Since this is way OT, if you know the answer, just email me; don't
reply to the list.

  - a

References:
- where do stack traces get filled in?
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: where do stack traces get filled in?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: where do stack traces get filled in?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]