This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: should UINT32 be a macro or typedef?



Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> Adam> Somewhere in the headers pulled in by libjava/boehm.cc, one
> Adam> header wants UINT32 to be a #define, and another wants it to be
> Adam> a typedef. I haven't figured out exactly where the conflict is,
> Adam> but when I find it, which one is "right"?

> Do either the GC or libjava use this?

Yeah, it's a five-step transitive inclusion... if you like I can
unhack it and rebuild to get the sequence of includes that causes the
problem.


> I don't remember ever seeing it.  If that's the case then it is some
> kind of clash between system headers.  In that scenario any
> documented fix is fine.

Okay, I'll leave the undef and put a comment by it. It's probably the
mingw headers...


  - a


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]