This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: status of gcj's boehm collector?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>,"'Adam Megacz'" <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 17:34:44 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: status of gcj's boehm collector?
References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BEDEE@hplex1.hpl.hp.com><15376.36836.803825.695524@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><3C117A99.7010403@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>

Bryce McKinlay writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > 
 > >What I'm wondering is whether this is a real or a theoretical
 > >requirement for gcj.  So, for our current implementation, is there any
 > >chance that calling System.gc() might not call finalizers for files
 > >that are garmabge before returing? 
 > >
 > 
 > Yes! The finalizers are run from a separate thread, so its most likely 
 > that they will not have run when System.gc() returns.

Ah, yes, I see.  A patch is required, then.

Andrew.

References:
- RE: status of gcj's boehm collector?
  - From: Boehm, Hans
- RE: status of gcj's boehm collector?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: status of gcj's boehm collector?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]