This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
December 30, 2001
19:32 | Re: idea for StackOverflowException | Adam Megacz |
December 29, 2001
09:12 | patch2 darwin & libgcj | Andreas Tobler |
09:12 | Patch1 darwin & libgcj | Andreas Tobler |
December 28, 2001
14:52 | Re: tzname in natSystem.cc on darwin5.2 | Andreas Tobler |
12:32 | Re: tzname in natSystem.cc on darwin5.2 | Tom Tromey |
07:12 | tzname in natSystem.cc on darwin5.2 | Andreas Tobler |
December 27, 2001
23:29 | idea for StackOverflowException | Andrew Haley |
23:01 | idea for StackOverflowException | Adam Megacz |
December 25, 2001
14:01 | Re: Hashtable order | Tom Tromey |
11:39 | wierd pauses: the aftermath [win32 hash-sync and incremental GC "mostly work"] | Adam Megacz |
01:14 | Hashtable order | Santosh Cheler |
December 24, 2001
09:09 | Re: IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vscritical sections | Jeff Sturm |
08:49 | Re: criticalsections are very fast / pooling mutexes / how does hash-sync work? | Jeff Sturm |
08:26 | Re: does --enable-hash-synchronization still require -fhash-synchronization? | Jeff Sturm |
08:24 | Re: GCJ information | Jeff Sturm |
December 23, 2001
23:27 | does --enable-hash-synchronization still require -fhash-synchronization? | Adam Megacz |
23:11 | Re: GCJ information | Vladimir Puskas |
20:13 | Re: IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vs critical sections | Adam Megacz |
17:41 | Re: criticalsections are very fast / pooling mutexes / how does h ash-sync work? | Adam Megacz |
17:08 | RE: criticalsections are very fast / pooling mutexes / how does hash-sync work? | Boehm, Hans |
15:27 | Re: IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vs critical sections | Adam Megacz |
15:21 | criticalsections are very fast / pooling mutexes / how does hash-sync work? | Adam Megacz |
14:30 | RE: IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vs critical sections | Boehm, Hans |
00:22 | IGNORE LAST POST; gc not at fault; questions about mutexes vs critical sections | Adam Megacz |
December 22, 2001
23:01 | Re: boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [help interpreting statistics?] | Tom Tromey |
21:58 | Re: boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [help interpreting statistics?] | Adam Megacz |
19:09 | RE: documentation for boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [more info] | Boehm, Hans |
18:04 | Re: documentation for boehm-gc tuning/profiling? [more info] | Adam Megacz |
17:23 | Re: documentation for boehm-gc tuning/profiling? | Adam Megacz |
14:48 | Re: GCJ information | Bryce McKinlay |
14:43 | Re: _Jv_AllocBytesChecked? | Bryce McKinlay |
14:38 | Re: documentation for boehm-gc tuning/profiling? | Bryce McKinlay |
12:39 | Re: timetable change on mingw-libgcj | Jonathan Olson |
06:20 | Re: documentation for boehm-gc tuning/profiling? | Jeff Sturm |
05:28 | Re: GCJ information | Vladimir Puskas |
01:20 | _Jv_AllocBytesChecked? | Adam Megacz |
00:43 | Re: null ClassLoader | Adam Megacz |
00:43 | documentation for boehm-gc tuning/profiling? | Adam Megacz |
December 21, 2001
21:27 | Re: bytecode compilation | Bryce McKinlay |
19:09 | bytecode compilation | Richard Henderson |
09:11 | Re: Can't build sparc-linux gcc-3.1 2001-12-19 java/lang/ThreadGroup.lo | Jeff Sturm |
08:49 | Re: null ClassLoader | Tom Tromey |
08:46 | Re: null ClassLoader | Tom Tromey |
07:54 | Re: Can't build sparc-linux gcc-3.1 2001-12-19 java/lang/ThreadGroup.lo | Tom Tromey |
December 20, 2001
23:22 | Can't build sparc-linux gcc-3.1 2001-12-19 java/lang/ThreadGroup.lo | Christian Jönsson |
10:57 | RE: System.gc() to close file descriptors (was RE: status of gcj's bo ehm collector?) | Boehm, Hans |
05:12 | Re: System.gc() to close file descriptors (was RE: status of gcj's bo ehm collector?) | Andrew Haley |
00:33 | Re: null ClassLoader | Raif S. Naffah |
December 19, 2001
22:56 | Re: null ClassLoader | Torsten Rüger |
18:49 | Re: null ClassLoader | Adam Megacz |
16:30 | Re: null ClassLoader | Tom Tromey |
15:23 | Re: safety of GCJ-generated code | Bryce McKinlay |
14:23 | consider me! right now!!! | Adam Megacz |
09:32 | RE: safety of GCJ-generated code | Andrew Haley |
09:23 | RE: safety of GCJ-generated code | Boehm, Hans |
02:56 | RE: safety of GCJ-generated code | Andrew Haley |
December 18, 2001
17:49 | gctest failure on sparc-solaris | Jeff Sturm |
16:25 | Re: Indirect dispatch without interpreter? | Daniel Hartin Pasco |
16:08 | Re: Indirect dispatch without interpreter? | Bryce McKinlay |
13:34 | Indirect dispatch without interpreter? | Jeff Sturm |
12:55 | RE: safety of GCJ-generated code | Boehm, Hans |
11:01 | VRP? (was Re: PATCH: Re: gcj non-optimization curiosity) | John Wehle |
10:12 | Re: safety of GCJ-generated code | Andrew Haley |
10:07 | Re: safety of GCJ-generated code | Andrew Haley |
10:03 | Re: safety of GCJ-generated code | Adam Megacz |
03:50 | Re: safety of GCJ-generated code | Andrew Haley |
December 17, 2001
December 16, 2001
23:54 | timetable change on mingw-libgcj | Adam Megacz |
23:49 | Re: gcj 3.0.x under SGI MIPS/Irix 6.5??? | Jeff Sturm |
22:36 | gcj 3.0.x under SGI MIPS/Irix 6.5??? | Daniel Hartin Pasco |
15:21 | Re: gcj non-optimization curiosity | Bryce McKinlay |
14:36 | Re: gnu.gcj.runtime.StringBuffer bug ??? | Tom Tromey |
14:34 | Re: Class.h and Class.java both define zero-arg constructor | Tom Tromey |
13:58 | IGNORE: Re: documentation on "sjlj exceptions", DWARF2, etc? | Adam Megacz |
13:53 | Re: documentation on "sjlj exceptions", DWARF2, etc? | Adam Megacz |
13:40 | Re: gcj non-optimization curiosity | Per Bothner |
13:29 | Re: gcj non-optimization curiosity | Per Bothner |
12:49 | gcj non-optimization curiosity | Tom Tromey |
02:34 | gnu.gcj.runtime.StringBuffer bug ??? | Olivier LF |
00:23 | Re: Class.h and Class.java both define zero-arg constructor | Bryce McKinlay |
00:10 | Re: Class.h and Class.java both define zero-arg constructor | Tom Tromey |
December 15, 2001
15:44 | Re: __get_eh_info? | Tom Tromey |
09:17 | Re: exceptions: gross hideous hack works, need guru to tell me ifI have caused major breakage | Andrew Haley |
08:57 | Re: exceptions: gross hideous hack works, need guru to tell me ifI have caused major breakage | Jeff Sturm |
03:42 | Re: System.gc() to close file descriptors (was RE: status of gcj's bo ehm collector?) | Andrew Haley |
02:43 | exceptions: gross hideous hack works, need guru to tell me if I have caused major breakage | Andrew Haley |
December 14, 2001
December 13, 2001
December 12, 2001
December 11, 2001
December 10, 2001
December 09, 2001
23:37 | boehm-gcc doesn't like threads=win32? | Adam Megacz |
23:32 | Fwd: gcc HEAD fails to compile - libjava | George France |
23:21 | Re: Stack size | Steen Jansdal |
22:59 | more cross-compiler work... | Adam Megacz |
21:01 | GC failure on alpha-linux | Jeff Sturm |
20:28 | patch gcj front end bug (switch without default) | Per Bothner |
20:06 | Re: More Tru64 errors | Jeff Sturm |
19:46 | Re: More Tru64 errors | Jeff Sturm |
19:17 | Re: More Tru64 errors | The Morsbergers |
19:10 | RE: More Tru64 errors | Jeff Sturm |
18:30 | Re: gcj bug (with -C ?) | Bryce McKinlay |
16:57 | gcj bug (with -C ?) | Tom Tromey |
13:55 | Re: More Tru64 errors | Bryce McKinlay |
12:21 | RE: More Tru64 errors | Boehm, Hans |
07:33 | Re: More Tru64 errors | Jeff Sturm |
December 08, 2001
19:47 | Re: More Tru64 errors | Bryce McKinlay |
19:29 | gcj front end bug | Tom Tromey |
18:38 | Re: More Tru64 errors | The Morsbergers |
18:26 | Re: gcj -C / gcj verifier bug (?) | Tom Tromey |
17:54 | Re: gcjh segfaults when passed two class names | Tom Tromey |
14:43 | More Tru64 errors | The Morsbergers |
12:22 | Re: gcjh segfaults when passed two class names | Adam Megacz |
12:19 | Re: status of gcj's boehm collector? | Mark Wielaard |
11:30 | Re: gcjh segfaults when passed two class names | Tom Tromey |
11:29 | Re: libgcj2: ObjectInputStream.readObject() calls constructors | Tom Tromey |
09:39 | Re: libgcj2: serialization of java.util.Date broken? | Tom Tromey |
08:23 | Re: gcjh segfaults when passed two class names | Brian Jones |
01:35 | Re: status of gcj's boehm collector? | Andrew Haley |
December 07, 2001
December 06, 2001
16:05 | Re: PATH: check definite unassigment to final variables | Per Bothner |
15:53 | Re: PATH: check definite unassigment to final variables | Tom Tromey |
14:04 | Re: PATCH: re-enable static initializer optimization | Alexandre Petit-Bianco |
13:56 | Re: PATCH: re-enable static initializer optimization | Per Bothner |
13:52 | RE: status of gcj's boehm collector? | Boehm, Hans |
13:45 | Re: PATCH: re-enable static initializer optimization | Alexandre Petit-Bianco |
13:37 | PATCH: re-enable static initializer optimization | Per Bothner |
13:24 | Does GCJ make system calls that write pointrs? (was: Re: status of gcj's boehm collector?) | Adam Megacz |
10:49 | RE: status of gcj's boehm collector? | Andrew Haley |
10:35 | RE: status of gcj's boehm collector? | Boehm, Hans |
07:31 | Re: Stack size | Jonathan Olson |
07:26 | Re: Stack size | Jonathan Olson |
07:20 | Re: Stack size | Tom Tromey |
07:08 | Re: status of gcj's boehm collector? | Jonathan Olson |
03:08 | Re: Stack size | Andrew Haley |
December 05, 2001
December 04, 2001
December 03, 2001
23:22 | Re: libjava build failure on solaris2.6 | Bryce McKinlay |
22:49 | RE: GCJ as cross-compiler to embedded system | Gustav Kälvesten |
22:30 | libjava build failure on solaris2.6 | Andreas Tobler |
22:21 | Re: GCJ as cross-compiler to embedded system | Tom Tromey |
22:17 | Re: patch to java/verify.c | Tom Tromey |
18:27 | PATH: check definite unassigment to final variables | Per Bothner |
17:48 | patch: an optimization and a triviality | Per Bothner |
17:14 | patch: remove CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR/WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR from java | Per Bothner |
15:46 | patch to java/verify.c | Per Bothner |
15:11 | two trivial comment patches in gcc/java | Per Bothner |
11:33 | RE: `asm' in natObject.cc | Andrew Haley |
11:05 | RE: `asm' in natObject.cc | Boehm, Hans |
05:38 | RE: `asm' in natObject.cc | Andrew Haley |
December 02, 2001
22:18 | Re: newbie compilation problem | Anthony Green |
21:29 | GCJ as cross-compiler to embedded system | Gustav Kälvesten |
20:00 | Re: newbie compilation problem | Bryce McKinlay |
19:31 | newbie compilation problem | james_williams |
18:31 | RE: `asm' in natObject.cc | Boehm, Hans |
18:03 | Re: question about -fno-optimize-static-class-initialization | Bryce McKinlay |
15:06 | Re: question about -fno-optimize-static-class-initialization | Tom Tromey |
15:03 | Re: libjava/defineclass.cc won't build on Solaris/sparc | Tom Tromey |
13:53 | libjava/defineclass.cc won't build on Solaris/sparc | Alexandre Oliva |
12:44 | Re: `asm' in natObject.cc | Tom Tromey |
December 01, 2001
21:00 | Re: `asm' in natObject.cc | Bryce McKinlay |
17:41 | Re: `asm' in natObject.cc | Tom Tromey |
17:36 | compiler segfault (confusion with non public interfaces) | Olivier LF |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]