This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Non-synchronized StringBuffer


Tonight I hacked up something we've discussed here before: I changed
gcj so that `+' of Strings uses a gcj-specific unsynchronized copy of
StringBuffer.

I was surprised to discover that in my simple test (several thousand
String `+' operations), removing synchronization made the code slower.
I have no explanation for this.  In fact, if somebody else has an
explanation I'd love to hear it.

I didn't try stack-allocating the StringBuffer object itself.  This is
possible, but it was more work than I was willing to do tonight.

If anybody is interested in this I can send the patch I've got.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]