This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: got gcc-cvs to compile! [was Re: this pointer off by one?]

To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: got gcc-cvs to compile! [was Re: this pointer off by one?]
From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
Date: 13 Nov 2001 01:12:23 -0800
Organization: Myself
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111120927560.25240-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>


No -- the "as per the gcj compiling faq" refers to the line above what
you quoted -- "--with-threads" was my own misspelling.

  - a

Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> On 11 Nov 2001, Adam Megacz wrote:
> > As per the gcj compiling faq. I had been using "--with-threads=posix"
> > before -- not sure if that is an invalid configure option, though...
> 
> That's not correct.  Is it really in the FAQ?  I couldn't find any
> occurrence of --with-threads from a quick search of wwwdocs.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 

--

References:
- Re: got gcc-cvs to compile! [was Re: this pointer off by one?]
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]