This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gcj optimization situation?

To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: gcj optimization situation?
From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
Date: 09 Nov 2001 17:56:44 -0800
Organization: Myself
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111091048020.20315-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>


Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> In fact I tried both javac and gcj (adding gnu/gcj/RawData for the
> former).  Javac completed in 16 seconds; gcj in 8 seconds.   So I think
> gcj isn't doing too badly.

Okay. I probably mis-installed or something. I'll grab 3.1 as soon as
I get a chance.

  - a

-- 
If the Boston Tea Party happened today, our politicians would denounce
it as an act of Terrorism.

References:
- Re: gcj optimization situation?
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]