Re: another compiler better than gcj ?

[Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>]

Bryce McKinlay writes:
 > 
 > If there is hardware that doesn't match the spec, maybe it 
 > would be nice to be able to tell the back-end that we want a 
 > divide-with-java-semantics, and let it deal with it?

Better just to write the exception handler, I would have thought.
That way the call to _Jv_divI won't happen and the constant folding
will do the right thing.

Andrew.