This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
- To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
- From: Nic Ferrier <nferrier at tf1 dot tapsellferrier dot co dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:01:58 +0100
>Is it really easier to split the resources? I really have to think
>about this. It does not feel like such a great idea to split the few
>people that we have working on this stuff between different projects,
>CVS trees and mailinglists. Especially since they are all GNU
>projects.
It's good to split ClasspathX and Classpath.
The ClasspathX project has quite a few people who
are not involved elsewhere with GNU java (or GNU at all).
It's also good because the regimes are different, ClasspathX accepts
code without requiring (c) assignment, Classpath does not (because
Classpath is more important to GNU than ClasspathX is).
As for splits elsewhere, I don't know. It seems to me that the
gcj/classpath split is useful.
Nic