This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Unblocking blocked I/O

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Subject: Re: Unblocking blocked I/O
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 26 Sep 2001 18:18:22 -0600
Cc: David Vrabel <dv207 at hermes dot cam dot ac dot uk>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.HPX.4.33L.0109190913020.21743-200000@punch.eng.cam.ac.uk> <3BA99DDC.4020802@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <87n13iexie.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3BB26652.6050709@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

>> This is why the code used to check for the interrupt
>> unconditionally.  I think this part of the change should be
>> reverted.

Bryce> Of course, the semantics of interrupt are not well defined so
Bryce> either behaviour is probibly within spec, but in this case I
Bryce> thought that matching the the JDK was the right thing to do.

Sounds good to me.  Thanks.

Tom

References:
- Re: Unblocking blocked I/O
  - From: David Vrabel
- Re: Unblocking blocked I/O
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Unblocking blocked I/O
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Unblocking blocked I/O
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]