This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?

To: martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com
Subject: Re: Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?
From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:17:29 +1200
CC: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
References: <20010918073307.A9960@keksy.muc.infineon.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109181000200.9869-100000@mars.deadcafe.org> <20010925085615.A16391@keksy.muc.infineon.com>

Martin Kahlert wrote:

>Hi all!
>Now a weak is over since this mail but nobody cared about it.
>Is libjava for gcc-3.0.2 considered closed?
>

Nope.

I don't mind checking patches into 3.0, but what I would like to see is 
a list of patches (just the changelog entries would be fine) that should 
be considered, from someone who uses the 3.0 branch. Once we have that I 
can go through and check that they are appropriate, then apply them all 
in one batch, run tests, etc. This would save a lot of time, and I'm 
sure there must be more than 2 - 3 patches which should go in...

regards

Bryce.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?
  - From: Martin Kahlert

References:
- Re: Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?
  - From: Martin Kahlert
- Re: Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?
  - From: Martin Kahlert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]