Re: Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?

[Martin Kahlert <martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com>]

Hi all!
Now a weak is over since this mail but nobody cared about it.
Is libjava for gcc-3.0.2 considered closed?

Maybe i should switch to the main line, but snapshots are generated for
gcc-3.0.2, only.

Tom, could you spend a mighty word of wisdom here ;-)
The 646-patch for Solaris is not applied on 3.0.2.

Thanks for any advice for future steps,
Martin.

PS: Has there been any progress in the implementation of the
    invocation API?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:09:47AM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Martin Kahlert wrote:
> > thanks for committing the two patches.
> 
> I only applied the convert patch, since it is a nearly obvious fix.
> 
> > 2001-05-03  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
> > 
> > 	* java/lang/natRuntime.cc (init): Call add_library on the program
> > 	itself.
> > 	(_Jv_FindSymbolInExecutable): Return NULL if no library on the
> > 	list has the symbol.
> 
> > 2001-06-15  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
> > 
> > 	* jni.cc (_Jv_JNI_NewLocalRef): Search other frames.
> 
> These are reasonable suggestions.  But it's really not up to me to decide
> what does/does not go in 3.0.2.  Would anyone object to committing these?
> 
> Jeff

-- 
The early bird catches the worm. If you want something else for       
breakfast, get up later.