This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: do I have to have ligcj as a static lib
- To: "Niklas Fondberg" <niklas dot fondberg at i3micro dot com>
- Subject: Re: do I have to have ligcj as a static lib
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 11 Sep 2001 18:38:04 -0600
- Cc: java gnu <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <3B9B55FD.658E3697@i3micro.org>
- Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Niklas" == Niklas Fondberg <niklas.fondberg@i3micro.com> writes:
Niklas> if I wan't to compile non shared lib dependant binaries?
I don't understand. libgcj is built as both a static and a shared
library. If you want to build a statically-linked program, you ought
to be able to.
Note however that static linking isn't tested too often and so there
may be problems. I don't know.
Tom