RE: Segmentation faults

[Bryan Ha <kfh1_99 at yahoo dot com>]

Thanks a lot for all the comments.

I am running this on Linux SuSE6.4 PPC. I think there
is a problem with the gcj version which I believe was
modified.

I'll let you know if I find any interesting
observations.

Cheers,

Bryan


 --- "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com> wrote: > What
does the client code look like?  It sounds like
> you're calling execve
> directly from the gcj process, not from a forked
> child?  What platform are
> you on?
> 
> This sounds a bit like other threads are not getting
> killed before an
> execve?  As far as I can tell, glibc on Linux at
> least attempts to do this
> right.
> 
> Hans
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Haley
> [mailto:aph@cambridge.redhat.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:10 PM
> > To: Bryan Ha
> > Cc: tromey@redhat.com; java@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: Segmentation faults
> > 
> > 
> > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bryan=5FHa?= writes:
> >  > Tom,
> >  > 
> >  > I am using the char*[] I got out from the
> jstringarray
> >  > using the procedure you showed me last time. I
> have
> >  > printed out the arguments and it seems okay.
> >  > 
> >  > Anyway, if this has been done before, I have
> done
> >  > something wrong. I will check that again.
> > 
> > Lotsa times.  Look at name-finder.cc and
> name-finder.h for a simple
> > example of execve used with gcj.
> > 
> > My guess is that you're having some sort of
> conflict with the garbage
> > collector.
> > 
> > Andrew.
> >  

____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie