This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: GCC 3.0: "configure: error: libffi has not been ported to s390-linux-gnu."
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0: "configure: error: libffi has not been ported to s390-linux-gnu."
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 11 Aug 2001 16:35:13 -0300
- Cc: uweigand at de dot ibm dot com, Hartmut Penner <HPENNER at de dot ibm dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <u8pua2ilp0.fsf@gromit.moeb><or3d6yiim0.fsf@feijoada.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><u8g0ayquvl.fsf@gromit.moeb>
On Aug 11, 2001, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> wrote:
> Is libffi a prerequisite for gcj? In other words would libgcj work
> without libffi?
IIRC, yes, it would, but it wouldn't support the interpreter or JNI.
But please don't take my word for it. Hopefully someone in the java
mailing list will know for sure.
> And therefore I fear we have to disable gcj completly for s390 until
> libffi is ported - but I don't know enough about gcj and therefore
> like to get some comments before sending a patch (I doubt that libffi
> will be ported in time for GCC 3.0.1).
Sounds reasonable. It's quite likely that boehm-gc would also need
porting (unless it was already done), and perhaps even libjava itself
would need porting, so disabling libgcj entirely for 3.0.1 is probably
the best course of action.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me