This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: gcj performance on Solaris 2.6
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Subject: Re: gcj performance on Solaris 2.6
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:37:37 +1200
- CC: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107261437590.31874-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>
Jeff Sturm wrote:
> I built one application library at -O0, -O2 and -O3 with the patch below,
> and at -O2 unpatched for comparison.
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1659369 247180 704 1907253 1d1a35 libjacl-O0.so
> 2474525 243612 704 2718841 297c79 libjacl-O2-unpatched.so
> 1354881 237836 704 1593421 18504d libjacl-O2.so
> 1418826 236272 704 1655802 1943fa libjacl-O3.so
I applied this patch and found it made no difference to the size of a libgcj
built with -O2. Any ideas why?
regards
Bryce.