This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Handling High Priority Java PRs.
- To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Handling High Priority Java PRs.
- From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:49:37 -0700
- Cc: warnes at queenbee dot fhcrc dot org, pere at hungry dot com
- Reply-to: apbianco at cygnus dot com
In a recent email (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg00171.html)
Mark Mitchell said that he would like to see fewer high priority Java
PRs.
Right now, as far as gcj goes, we're down to 4:
2955 target configure-target-boehm-gc do not compile
Petter reports that this bug is still there. I can't reproduce
the problem because I don't have access to a Debian 2.2 box.
Not being able to build gcj on Debian is a very serious
problem IMO, I don't think the priority of this PR should be
downgraded, but on the other hand, I can't really look into
it. Anyone running a similar configuration to help?
247 ICE compiling methods which handle Double values @ -O2
I put this in feedback as I was unable to reproduce the bug using
the test cases on x86, PPC. Alpha shows bugs with the class
files, but the work around is to use -O3. In the spirit of the
PR (-O2 on x86/linux), I could close it and in the lights of
the new findings, its priority could be reduced to `medium.'
Would that outrage Alpha fans?
2299 Use of += for String arrays produces Segfault during compilation
I'm considering closing this PR as Tom wrote a patch I'm retesting
at the moment.
3062 optimized eh code crashes
This just came in.
As far as libgcj goes, we're down to one PR (2833) which I think could
be closed, right?
./A