This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: 3.0: unwinder changes
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: 3.0: unwinder changes
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:43:05 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: apbianco at cygnus dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Alexandre Petit-Bianco writes:
> >
> > Andrew Haley writes:
> >
> > > Note that you need new binutils to build on Alpha.
> >
> > Newer than what? I've been using 2.10.1, should I be using a source
> > snapshot instead?
>
> That's what I did. I don't know if 2.10.1 will work.
I used the 010521 snapshot for my alpha build. 2.11 will probably
work also. I saw some strangeness related to symbol versioning, but I
suspect the dynamic loader (not binutils) was responsible.
With a slightly modified Makefile I get these results:
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 1659
# of unexpected failures 9
# of unexpected successes 10
# of expected failures 14
# of untested testcases 24