This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Field resolution -vs- JNI

To: tromey at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Field resolution -vs- JNI
From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Date: 23 Mar 2001 10:31:06 -0800
Cc: Java Discuss List <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <87d7b93vfu.fsf@creche.redhat.com><m27l1h565j.fsf@kelso.bothner.com> <8766h0gxgg.fsf@creche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

> I agree.  Right now we call _Jv_InitClass way too much.  Eliminating
> those calls when possible would be nice.  For trivial classes we could
> compile the class in a pre-initialized state.

It would help if we could have the linker help with interning Strings,
then we don't have to worry about String literals at class init time.
Anyone know if the ELF dynamic linker has a "symbol-not-found"
callback hook? 
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/

References:
- Field resolution -vs- JNI
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Field resolution -vs- JNI
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Field resolution -vs- JNI
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]