This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PR 1159/1412

To: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: PR 1159/1412
From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Date: 21 Mar 2001 09:58:38 -0800
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <87ofuvf5zf.fsf@creche.redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.10.10103211237090.25606-100000@mars.deadcafe.org><15032.59209.559138.846567@host162.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com> writes:

> Constant folding.  However, we can't do this on bytecode until we have
> a version of fold() that obeys Java semantics.

I missed the specifics of this problem.  Could you summarize?

A simple version of constant-folding can probably be made part
of java_complete_lhs fairly easily.  Fancier optimizations
may be more painful.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]