This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PR 1159/1412

To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Subject: Re: PR 1159/1412
From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:39:21 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <87ofuvf5zf.fsf@creche.redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.10.10103211237090.25606-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > 
 > 
 > On 21 Mar 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
 > > Are you running the `gcj -C' step with -O2 as well?
 > 
 > No.  It seems nonsensical to use -O and -C together.  (There are
 > few truly useful optimizations you can perform on bytecode anyway.)

Constant folding.  However, we can't do this on bytecode until we have
a version of fold() that obeys Java semantics.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: PR 1159/1412
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]