This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libgcj/1736

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: libgcj/1736
From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 16:51:34 +1300
CC: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, rboehne at ricardo-us dot com, libtool at gnu dot org
References: <3AA48CC4.2D704022@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <orsnkrpecv.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <3AA5794A.32C97646@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <orelw8u47i.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Mar  6, 2001, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it would suffice to simply clear "wl" when entering the
> > incremental mode, assuming we know the linker will always be called
> > directly when doing incremental.
>
> Yep.  Please try this patch.

The patch doesn't work. I think thats because at this point, $libobjs has already been evaluated taking into
account the $wl value (around about line 3068).

regards

  [ bryce ]

References:
- Re: libgcj/1736
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: libgcj/1736
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libgcj/1736
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: libgcj/1736
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]