This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: Alignment of stack traces
- To: "'Jeff Sturm'" <jsturm at one-point dot com>, Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Subject: RE: Alignment of stack traces
- From: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 12:04:06 -0800
- Cc: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>, "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Are there enough other uses for this that it's worth doing?
Java primitive arrays almost fit the bill here, except that there's no way
to say "an array of pointer-sized integers. Java object arrays would work,
but add extra scanning time.
For now I'm using an array of Java longs, which doesn't appear to have
broken anything on Itanium. But I haven't even rebuilt on X86 yet.
Hans
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Sturm [mailto:jsturm@one-point.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:13 PM
> To: Bryce McKinlay
> Cc: Boehm, Hans; 'java@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: Alignment of stack traces
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> > Maybe we need a new type that is like RawData except it
> > is marked by GC, but isn't expected to have the usual java
> object header.
>
> For things created with _Jv_AllocBytes, you mean? That'd be
> a nice way to
> avoid the finalizer that often goes with RawData.
>
> Jeff
>