This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Lots of "make check" regressions

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
Subject: Re: Lots of "make check" regressions
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 23 Feb 2001 14:37:37 -0700
Cc: apbianco at cygnus dot com, "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE700902787664401E3A8E2@hplex1.hpl.hp.com> <14994.54130.293873.722438@deliverance.cygnus.com> <3A92E0E0.6F09038C@albatross.co.nz>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz> writes:

Bryce> I presume that the error shows up when boottrapping gcc with an
Bryce> older gcc? If so, then isn't it a bug that the current gcc (or
Bryce> at least the gcc build, which should have all strictness
Bryce> options enabled) doesn't report an error?

Is this a C9x extension?  If so maybe it isn't a bug.
Asking wouldn't hurt.

Tom

References:
- RE: Lots of "make check" regressions
  - From: Boehm, Hans
- RE: Lots of "make check" regressions
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Lots of "make check" regressions
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]