This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: do we need separate thread for FirstThread

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
Subject: Re: do we need separate thread for FirstThread
From: Cedric Berger <cedric at wireless-networks dot com>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 15:58:20 -0800
CC: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <m21yt8exes.fsf@kelso.bothner.com> <3A832F28.272B3DF8@albatross.co.nz>

> 
> The reason why we have a separate main thread currently is because it is
> simply easier and cleaner to do this way. We have to take into account
> Java daemon threads, which have to keep running even if main() exits.

I guess you're talking of non-deamon threads, right?

Cedric

References:
- do we need separate thread for FirstThread
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: do we need separate thread for FirstThread
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]