This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Does -fjni work with recent builds?

To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: Does -fjni work with recent builds?
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 20 Jan 2001 10:52:26 -0700
Cc: Barnet Wagman <wagman at enteract dot com>, "java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com" <java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
References: <3A689CA5.CCFD068C@enteract.com> <14952.43637.155596.871046@deliverance.cygnus.com> <3A68AC32.D88AFAD@enteract.com> <14952.49834.960934.811221@deliverance.cygnus.com> <873def6s7o.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <14952.63670.311703.185953@deliverance.cygnus.com>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

Alex> It seems to be related to the changes in make_decl_rtl. This
Alex> patch corrects the situation. If it works for you Barnet, I'll
Alex> check it in

Thanks.

Alex> (it's important to have a -fjni in order for 3.0, unless library
Alex> hackers think otherwise -- not a big deal of a patch anways.)

I agree this is important.  Really I should write `jni.exp' so that
the JNI code actually gets tested regularly... 

Tom

References:
- Does -fjni work with recent builds?
  - From: Barnet Wagman
- Re: Does -fjni work with recent builds?
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Does -fjni work with recent builds?
  - From: Barnet Wagman
- Re: Does -fjni work with recent builds?
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Does -fjni work with recent builds?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Does -fjni work with recent builds?
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]