This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: More bugs with inner classes (was: Freenet compilation errors.)
- To: "Mark J. Roberts" <mjr at statesmean dot com>
- Subject: Re: More bugs with inner classes (was: Freenet compilation errors.)
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 18 Jan 2001 16:19:03 -0700
- Cc: apbianco at cygnus dot com, java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101181150000.669-100000@rm03-24-131-185-22.ce.mediaone.net>
- Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark J Roberts <mjr@statesmean.com> writes:
Mark> Yeah, I was wrong about that. I thought you had to specify the
Mark> class like "Freenet.client.Client" but really you just do it
Mark> like "Freenet/client/Client", which is endlessly confusing.
You can use the class name with `.'. I just tested that and it works
fine.
Mark> It would be more intuitive if you simply used the full filename,
Mark> "Freenet/client/Client.class", or the class,
Mark> "Freenet.client.Client", but not a combination of the two.
I can't think of a reason that we couldn't use the file name. I doubt
I'll implement it, but I'd accept a patch.
Tom