This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Branching for GCC 3.0


Tom Tromey wrote:

> Joseph> * Will the old libstdc++ still be included in 3.0 (in
> Joseph> which case references to EGCS in it should be cleaned up,
> Joseph> etc.)?
>
> Mark> No.  As soon as GCJ doesn't need it, we will remove V2 from the
> Mark> source tree.  At least I think that's what we agreed upon the
> Mark> last time this went around.
>
> Guys, do we still need libstdc++ V2?
> My current build is done with --enable-libstdcxx-v3.
> I haven't tried deleting v2 to see if that works though.

No. libgcj requires libstdc++-v3. It does not work with the old
libstdc++ because it needs to find libsupc++. However, v3 has been the
default for some time so I believe the "--enable-libstdc++-v3" is no
longer required.

regards

  [ bryce ]



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]