This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Branching for GCC 3.0
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: Branching for GCC 3.0
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:03:46 +1300
- CC: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Java Discuss List <java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- References: <20010107125803Q.firstname.lastname@example.org> <Pine.LNX.email@example.com> <20010109114439H.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Tom Tromey wrote:
> Joseph> * Will the old libstdc++ still be included in 3.0 (in
> Joseph> which case references to EGCS in it should be cleaned up,
> Joseph> etc.)?
> Mark> No. As soon as GCJ doesn't need it, we will remove V2 from the
> Mark> source tree. At least I think that's what we agreed upon the
> Mark> last time this went around.
> Guys, do we still need libstdc++ V2?
> My current build is done with --enable-libstdcxx-v3.
> I haven't tried deleting v2 to see if that works though.
No. libgcj requires libstdc++-v3. It does not work with the old
libstdc++ because it needs to find libsupc++. However, v3 has been the
default for some time so I believe the "--enable-libstdc++-v3" is no
[ bryce ]