This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Segment Register thread descriptor (was Re: Jv_AllocBytesChec ked)
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Subject: Re: Segment Register thread descriptor (was Re: Jv_AllocBytesChec ked)
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 04 Jan 2001 21:47:19 -0700
- Cc: "'Bryce McKinlay'" <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, "'java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com'" <java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>, "'drepper at redhat dot com'" <drepper at redhat dot com>, "MOSBERGER, DAVID (HP-PaloAlto,unix3)" <davidm at hpl dot hp dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE700902787664401E3A7FE@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
- Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Hans> (See stl_threads.h in libstdc++-v3. It actually looks like there
Hans> is a second implementation in libstc++-v3 in atomicity.h. What
Hans> a mess.)
If we can't get it into glibc then maybe we can at least share these
implementations. We can just start a mini-library (maybe just a
header file or something) that is incorporated where needed.
It looks like at least some of the atomicity.h files come from glibc.
Is this ok to do? It seems like this would make part of libstdc++