This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: Jv_AllocBytesChecked (Was: What is wrong with Vector?)
- To: "'Boehm, Hans'" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Subject: RE: Jv_AllocBytesChecked (Was: What is wrong with Vector?)
- From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:45:49 -0800
- Cc: "'java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com'" <java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>, "'tromey at redhat dot com'" <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- Reply-To: "green at cygnus dot com" <green at cygnus dot com>
On Thursday, December 21, 2000 4:33 PM, Boehm, Hans [SMTP:hans_boehm@hp.com]
wrote:
> The gcc man page claims this has only a size impact. (I assume
> it does effectively add flow edges to the analysis, but I'm not sure that
> has much impact if you only pass through the exception.)
I think it works like this...
Architectures using sjlj exceptions take a code size and performance hit.
Architectures using pc range tables for exceptions take a data size hit.
AG