This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: asynchronous_exceptions

To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: asynchronous_exceptions
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:50:18 -0800
Cc: java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20001214004314.A11714@redhat.com> <14904.39473.272946.821516@viagra.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 10:00:17AM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Will this ensure memory accesses aren't moved out of their try blocks
> by cse and/or sched?

I guess the most correct answer is "yes".  But the reason 
being that each such access will be individually tagged,
and the optimizers won't have to think about them.

r~

References:
- asynchronous_exceptions
  - From: Richard Henderson
- asynchronous_exceptions
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]