This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: static linking
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: static linking
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 06 Dec 2000 00:42:59 -0200
- Cc: jeff dot sturm at commerceone dot com, java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <3A2D85B3.E57E33A8@appnet.com> <3A2D8F9D.A3E2F78D@albatross.co.nz>
On Dec 5, 2000, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz> wrote:
> gcj shouldn't need to do anything special to get the supc++ stuff,
> it should all be put into libgcj.a, the same way it gets built into
> libstdc++.
Methinks explicitly linking libstdc++ in should be enough.
> The best solution, I think, would be to make a compiler option that allows you to
> do this more easily. eg
> "--link=gnu.gcj.protocol.jar.Handler,gnu.gcj.protocol.http.Handler" or something.
Good idea.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me