This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Java project.
gcj 2.96 and rh7
- To: java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: gcj 2.96 and rh7
- From: Mojo Jojo <david-b at pacbell dot net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:48:28 -0800
[ RESEND -- this went out 20-Nov but vanished entirely ]
I've been using GCJ with some Java/Linux software, and
it mostly behaves -- nice to have a more recent "QA'd"
release than the 2.95 series! -- but I thought some folk
might be interested in some problems I saw there:
- nonstatic inner classes compiled wrong from source.
I ran into several runtime SEGVs where GDB said
the "this" pointer was bogus. All went away if I
just made those inner classes be static. (These
were nonpublic classes, which may have mattered;
several classes needed that same workaround.)
- a "catch" clause in a constructor seemed to cause
the constructor to return a null object, until I
noticed that a System.err.println() call seemed
to perturb code generation so that it worked. (The
only tricky bit in that "catch" was a conditional
rethrow of the caught exception, I'd say.)
- "java -help" didn't list "--main=" as significant.
(And the usual similar minor frustrations.)
Everything seems to be working OK now. I hadn't used
GCJ since about this time last year, and it's much
improved! I look forward to GCJ getting into GCC 3.x,
facilitating a new chapter for Java developers!
With respect to performance, I noticed two things very
quickly. First, startup time is negligible compared to
the same program using JDK 1.3 (or even 1.2); since one
common usage is a command line program, that matters.
Second, I/O seemed a lot faster: Sun's JVM is "jerky"
at many things; the GCJ version was consistently fast,
and felt "peppy". (This software is I/O centric.)
Are other folk having success with this version of GCJ?
- Dave