[Fwd: [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000-10-29]]

[Frank Endriss <Frank dot Endriss at bancos dot com>]

Gotcha, I made it run !
Thats the way it worked for me:

Compile and install 2.95.2 (make bootstrap)
Compile and install a current version (make bootstrap)
Set your PATH in a way that 2.95.2 is used.
Compile the current version without bootstrap, just compile
via make. This will crash. But: somewhere in your build
dir you will find the executable jc1.
Copy this jc1 to the location where your previous
installed the current version (there is a jc1, too, over-
write it).

Magic: This version of gcc will build libgcj.

mfg Frank Endriss

Tom.Williams@diversifiedsoftware.com schrieb:
> 
> Hi! I'm still getting this problem with gcj-20001030 built with gcc-2.95.2
> and libgcj-snapshot-2000-10-30.
> 
> Peace......
> 
> Tom
> 
> Frank Endriss <Frank.Endriss@bancos.com>@sources.redhat.com on 11/01/2000
> 09:02:07 AM
> 
> Sent by:  java-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
> 
> To:   java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> cc:
> Subject:  [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000-10-29]
> 
> Alexandre Petit-Bianco schrieb:
> >
> > Tom.Williams@diversifiedsoftware.com writes:
> >
> > > I used egcs-20001016 (I think) to build egcs-20001023.  Do you think
> > > I have a bad gcj?
> >
> > This is similar to what I encountered yesterday. Make sure you `which
> > gcc` doesn't grab something you installed recently but rather use the
> > default compiler. Rebuild jc1, install and then build libgcj.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> it would be nice if you tell which version of gcc/gcj do you
> think of as "default compiler".
> I checked that it is not 2.92.2, since this version wont compile
> the current libgcj.
> 
> thanks,
> mfg Frank Endriss