This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: CNI namespace


Wouldn't one need to get locks, while for the other getting locks would
be just pure overhead?

On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 12:56:30PM -0700, per@bothner.com wrote:
> Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> writes:
> 
> > In some situations it is useful for a CNI "jobject" and a JNI
> > "jobject" to be different.  For instance, this is the case if we have
> > a precise, copying collector that doesn't have the ability to lock
> > down an object.
> 
> I don't get it.  How does having two kinds of jobject help?
> -- 
> 	--Per Bothner
> per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]