Re: gcj performance: benchmarks

[Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>]

Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz> writes:

> Some interesting but slightly disappointing numbers.

> Conclusions: ...

(3) There is a lot of room for profiling and tuning in Gcj/Gij.
We have mostly concentrated on functionality, but we know many
things we could improve.  Some profiling might help point out
the hot spots.

Btw - note also that Gcj can do noticably better when compiling
from source than when compiling from bytecode.  For example you
get much better loop optimizations from source. The Gcc back-end
people think it should not be very difficult to "recover" the
loops from the bytecode, but for now I recommend compiling
from source any benchmarks (using a de-compiler if need be) - at
least any that we want public!
-- 
	--Per Bothner
bothner@pacbell.net  per@bothner.com   http://home.pacbell.net/bothner/