This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: BufferedOutputStream patch
- To: warrenl@cygnus.com (Warren Levy)
- Subject: Re: BufferedOutputStream patch
- From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 18:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: jmc@cmpharm.ucsf.edu, java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com, mauve-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Warren Levy writes:
> So folks, anyone have opinions/justifications either way? Is the JDK 1.1
> doc'ed behavior the way to go (BufferedOutputStream flush on overflow;
> BufferedWriter flush on fill)? Or the JDK 1.2 doc'ed behavior (flush on
> fill for both)? Or neither (flush on overflow for both)? I'm interested
> in hearing the different points of view on this. If you supply empirical
> evidence, please note whether it is version 1.1.* or 1.2 of the JDK.
For what it's worth, kaffe flushes on overflow for both.
-Archie
___________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com