This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libgjc vs. classpath
- To: jews@imada.sdu.dk
- Subject: Re: libgjc vs. classpath
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@pasanda.cygnus.co.uk>
- Date: 12 Jun 1999 17:34:41 -0000
- CC: java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 13:08:44 +0200
> From: Jesper Pedersen <jews@imada.sdu.dk>
>
> Hi.
>
> What is the difference between libgjc and classpath
> (www.classpath.org) ?
There are issues to do with licensing and cleanroom implementation: I
don't want to talk about them because I'm not qualified to do so.
However, there are also technical issues. libgcj is differnt from
other Java lbraries because it's designed to support a compiled
environment rather than a bytecode interpreter. libgcj also requires
g++ in order to support the Cygnus Native Interface, so it's not
written in purely standard C++.
> I want just wondering why there where two big Open-Source projects doing
> the same thing. And then ofcourse there is Kaffe.
That's your answer: libgcj and classpath are not really doing the same
thing.
Andrew.