This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977regressions (libjava failures)
- From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:08:33 +0000
- Subject: [Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977regressions (libjava failures)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-52805-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-03-31
CC| |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-31 20:08:33 UTC ---
reverting the change does restore libjava function.
- I took a very quick look at the asm output from a "HelloWorld.class" (with
the patch in place) and it seems reasonable. Presumably, some more complex
case (my example code only has one class) might be misrepresented.