This is the mail archive of the java-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libgcj/38685] classmap.db is zero bytes long in 64 bit directory



------- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com  2009-01-01 12:09 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Can you try 4.3.2?

No, I don't have it, and next I was planning on build-testing the trunk.


The reason for reporting "so old a version" (_if_ that is the point you are
making "Can you try 4.3.2?") is that I am reporting what I am currently
compiling. 

I am compiling 4.2.x because it is the newest version of gcc that has the
fewest number of "make -i check" errors while still being able to compile
the majority of the (poorly written) type of c++ source code that is still
available on the Internet. 

It (gcc 4.2.2) is the 'proverbial 3.4.3' of the 4.x series. Newer (but not
newest) gcc versions (like 4.3) cost (me) too much compatibility with the
old-c++ source still commonly available without adding enough incentive
(features, speed, compatibility, fewer compiler bugs).

When I get a 4.x series compiler installed (instead of my Operating System's
default 3.4.3 (from 2005)) I am going to work on the trunk.


> Can you try 4.3.2?
If there is a particular reason that we need 4.3.2 to work on OpenSolaris
and that you would prefer me to run the testsuites on 4.3.2 instead of
the trunk please let me know and I can set aside time to download / build /
check / and report it.

Rob


-- 

rob1weld at aol dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |major


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38685


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]