This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
[Bug java/33218] Process.waiFor() Process.destroy() misbehave for childs which are not reacting to Ctrl+C SIGQUIT
- From: "cyberflex at mail dot ru" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Aug 2007 10:16:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug java/33218] Process.waiFor() Process.destroy() misbehave for childs which are not reacting to Ctrl+C SIGQUIT
- References: <bug-33218-14857@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from cyberflex at mail dot ru 2007-08-29 10:16 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=14129)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14129&action=view) [edit]
> Test case that works.
>
> With the new "Test case that works" and attached test.sh and the original
> test.sh I get no failures on x86_64-pc-linux (FC6) with: gcj (GCC) 4.3.0
> 20070728 (experimental)
>
> I am inclined to mark the bug as Works-for-me in a few days if it cannot be
> reproduced on the trunk.
>
Ok, that's need more investigation.
I'll be working on my project again (choosing workaround) in a few days,
I'll investigate in more detail the situation when I see the issue at both
architectures.
I no mean to reproduce is found (till the middle of the next week) then the bug
may be reopened as a good testcase would be produced.
Thank you for looking through current code.
In GCJ 3.x.x we had a couple of troubles with zombie childs may be some
nonetrivial case is not swept pou yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33218