This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
[Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Feb 2005 04:55:24 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
- References: <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 04:55 -------
The Process_* failure should be fixed by:
2005-02-15 David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>
* prims.cc (_Jv_CreateJavaVM): Add comment about initialization order.
* posix-threads.cc (_Jv_InitThreads): Call block_sigchld() here to
ensure that GC threads inherit the new signal mask.
(block_sigchld): Call JvFail rather than throwing exception if
pthread_sigmask() fails.
But since none of us have solaris we could not test it.
The following thread is where this patch comes from:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00415.html
So which testcases are regressions now (well just to make sure that I don't make a mistake when the
next one gets fixed)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353