This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
libgcj/7578: gcc-3.1.1 libjava regression: tons of new FAILS on check
- From: nirkko at dkf6 dot unibe dot ch
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Aug 2002 14:56:12 -0000
- Subject: libgcj/7578: gcc-3.1.1 libjava regression: tons of new FAILS on check
- Reply-to: nirkko at dkf6 dot unibe dot ch
>Number: 7578
>Category: libgcj
>Synopsis: gcc-3.1.1 libjava regression: tons of new FAILS on check
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Aug 12 08:06:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch
>Release: gcc-3.1.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
Sun SPARC Solaris 2.6 (and Linux, and others...)
>Description:
after gcc bootstrap:
whereas in gcc-3.1, gmake -k check results
for libjava were in the 'usual' range, now
in gcc-3.1.1 there are tons of unexpected FAILS,
which seems a regression to me. Looking at your
"successful builds" webpage, this seems so also
on other platforms (for example, Linux-i86).
Do tests FAIL because of assembler warnings,
and newer assemblers (gas-2.13) issue more of them?
or was there a major change in the testsuite or
in libjava code?
>How-To-Repeat:
take gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.1.1
'gmake bootstrap' and 'gmake -k check' each of them.
compare results.
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: