This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: gcj/318: local classes are named incorrectly
- To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: gcj/318: local classes are named incorrectly
- From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
- Date: 16 Aug 2000 09:00:01 -0000
- Cc: java-prs at sourceware dot cygnus dot com,
- Reply-To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
The following reply was made to PR gcj/318; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
To: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: gcj/318: local classes are named incorrectly
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
bryce@albatross.co.nz writes:
> This is because gcj names both the local classes "Locals$B"
> instead of "Locals$1$B" and "Locals$2$B".
> >How-To-Repeat:
I've been aware of this problem. I also seem to remember that the way
anonymous classes are named isn't right, though it doesn't really
affect how programs run. Thank you.
./A