Re: gcj/224

[Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>]

The following reply was made to PR gcj/224; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz>
To: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>
Cc: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: gcj/224
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 19:07:02 +1200

 Mo DeJong wrote:
 
 > We might not want to do that just yet. I have been talking with
 > alex about a new compiler regression test system that I would
 > like to see used. The good this about my approach is that we
 > would be able to share compiler regresion tests with the Jikes
 > and Kaffe Java projects.
 
 I too would like to see a better regression test system. I think the advantage of
 the existing one is that it is compatible with the existing test infrastructure for
 the other gcc front ends, however it really is far too naive for our purposes. It
 would definatly be good to have a shared test infrastructure with jikes and kaffe,
 but its not clear if we could put such a thing into the libgcj/gcc tree due to
 licensing concerns (Tom?)
 
 regards
 
   [ bryce ]