This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libgcj/101
- To: bryce at albatross dot co dot nz
- Subject: Re: libgcj/101
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Date: 29 Mar 2000 00:50:00 -0000
- Cc: java-prs at sourceware dot cygnus dot com,
- Reply-To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
The following reply was made to PR libgcj/101; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz>
To: Joerg Brunsmann <Joerg.Brunsmann@FernUni-Hagen.de>
Cc: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: libgcj/101
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:46:36 +1200
Joerg Brunsmann wrote:
> #5 0xff222ca0 in _Jv_makeUtf8Const (s=0xff2f4c28 "()V", len=3)
> at ../../../libjava/prims.cc:225
> #6 0xff2b40f0 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 (__initialize_p=1,
> __priority=65535) at ../../../libjava/java/lang/natClass.cc:70
> #7 0xff2b41e0 in global constructors keyed to java::lang::Class::forName ()
> at ../../../libjava/java/lang/natClass.cc:73
> Any suggestions?
Looks like it could be the infamous Solaris vs. libtool vs. C++ static
initializers bug? I think I remember having this problem when I was using libgcj
on Solaris x86. I don't really know how I fixed it...
[ bryce ]